We may need to have this as a point of discussion (debate?) at
our next gathering, but I wanted to share an article that really
resonated with me. For a while now I have been struggling with what
feels like a loss of creative purity. To me creative purity is art born from earnest not art that has been productized, strategized, or even made with an intention to be monetized. When it comes to music, I am referring to music for the sake of creativity, not the pursuit of
endorsement
deals, Twitter followers, or downloads. My favorite book ever, Ever,
EVER (yes that is a tongue in cheek nod to an of the moment "artist") captured one
era of pure creativity (that I'm obsessed with BTW...) amazingly well and has an example of what seems missing today in the music world. In 'Just Kids' Patti Smith tells a story
of Kris Kristofferson and Janis Joplin sitting on the floor in a room of
the Chelsea Hotel as "Bobby McGee" rose not from from their production
team but but grew from six strings and a creative purity (and OK, yes, probably a bottle of bourbon but you get the idea).
Back to the article though... it focuses on the recent trend of packaging music as/with high art and how it has not really panned out. For the musicians it just comes across as pretentious and for the artist, the music is not a resource for deepening our sense of love or spontaneity to their art-forms. Can I get a "I know, right?!" ? I mean riddle me this Lady Gaga - the release of ARTPOP is apparently meant to inspire me to run down to H&M for some off price fashion, get behind the wheel of a re-designed Kia, DVR SNL, and amidst all these relatively down-market marketing opportunities have me associate you with high-art? And Hova, come on! Barney's, the 40/40 Club with its golden bats and bubbly, Picasso? I get it, you got out of the projects but putting yourself on a gilded pedestal and proclaiming yourself as being high-art carries more an air of arrogance than demonstrating any appreciation for or understanding of creative purity.
I don't know that the comments on Kanye resonate for me, but check the article out and in addition to the next UMCHofF debates, maybe we can opine on creative purity too.
Here's the link: http://thebea.st/Ia6s3k
Back to the article though... it focuses on the recent trend of packaging music as/with high art and how it has not really panned out. For the musicians it just comes across as pretentious and for the artist, the music is not a resource for deepening our sense of love or spontaneity to their art-forms. Can I get a "I know, right?!" ? I mean riddle me this Lady Gaga - the release of ARTPOP is apparently meant to inspire me to run down to H&M for some off price fashion, get behind the wheel of a re-designed Kia, DVR SNL, and amidst all these relatively down-market marketing opportunities have me associate you with high-art? And Hova, come on! Barney's, the 40/40 Club with its golden bats and bubbly, Picasso? I get it, you got out of the projects but putting yourself on a gilded pedestal and proclaiming yourself as being high-art carries more an air of arrogance than demonstrating any appreciation for or understanding of creative purity.
I don't know that the comments on Kanye resonate for me, but check the article out and in addition to the next UMCHofF debates, maybe we can opine on creative purity too.
Here's the link: http://thebea.st/Ia6s3k