So one of the whole reasons for yesterdays post was that I wanted to give a quick rundown of the new stuff that I've been listening to over the past month. Or more precisely, new to me.
Olivia Tremor Control -- Dusk at Cubist Castle: In The Aeroplane Over The Sea is one of my favorite discs, so I've been wanting to check this out for awhile since Jeff Magnum is heavily featured in both. I usually roll my eyes whenever something is labeled at "Beatle-esque" because I have never actually heard anything of the sort in music so described. Except here, I really kind of do. Which is cool. I like this quite a bit, and thankfully it seems on casual listens to be nowhere as harrowing as ITAOTS.
Tortoise -- Beacons of Ancestorship: I have one other Tortoise disc that I can't remember the title of offhand, but I like it enough to give this a try. But this veers periously close to jazz fusion. And if there is one thing besides Modern Country that I am not a fan of, it is jazz fusion.
Aim -- Flight 602: This on the other hand is just excellent workin' music. Nice beats, clever samples. A couple vocals which are a little weaker than the rest of the disc, but I'm a fan of this guy.
Streets -- A Grand Don't Come for Free: I thank Music Club for turning me on to this even though it took awhile to finally download. This is awesome and I'll be getting the rest soon.
Frank Zappa -- Joe's Garage parts 1-3: Listening to this again after 20-odd years I find the things that tickled my 18 year old brain still do, and though I still think there are too many 8 minute guitar solos I do appreciate the complexity of the music far more now. At least one disc too long though. And it is sort of a shame that the vulgarity sort of obscures the arrangements. Which is an odd feeling for me since prudishness is not really something I relate to.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
I want to bite the hand that feeds me
Slow day and I haven't posted for awhile and so for some god-forsaken reason I thought I'd share how I process music these days on the trusty ol' iPod. Ideally I'd just hit random and everything would come up in a perfectly spaced manner and then this post would be over, but of course it has to be much more complicated than that.
You may say "Why, Pat, why must you be so random? Whatever is wrong with listening to entire discs? I don't even know you anymore, man!". Fair. Easy response is that I don't want to have to figure out what to listen to every forty minutes or so. Slightly deeper response is that I love the spontaneity of radio but hate what actually ends up being radio programming. And to get to the core of the matter I have a fascination with the theory of randomness and the ways that it manifests itself, whether through fate, divination or even quantum mechanics; and even more than that the ways that order might be discerned in the midst of randomness. Not having a particular aptitude for mathematics past intermediate algebra and/or Excel formulas I have to rely on more layman and pragmatic ways to indulge this fascination, and putting together the perfect daily random song generation system is about as close as I can regularly get to that.
I do not believe the theories that Apple has any kind of complicated algorithym that determines what comes up when one hits shuffle on their iPod, mainly because I do not see any reason that a company that has the goal of maximizing a profit margin needs to do anything more complicated than assigning each file a number and then generating a random number to play next. That said, boy do the same numbers seem to come up more often than I'd prefer and conversely many numbers I really want to hear come up seldom if ever. Thus, the need to improve on the standard.
First of all I have a master playlist (creatively enough called "A List"). This currently consists of around 6,000 songs (I think there are closer to 10-12K in our entire iTunes library), and is populated in part with: Any new songs over the past few years I've done this, everything by artists I'm still interested in hearing, all music club selections, and generally everything in my library that I don't think will make me groan when it comes on. Mistakes have been made of both inclusion and omission I am sure. That's just too many songs for me to rank in any kind of rating system, so how we choose what gets played out of that list is based on number of plays.
This is where smart playlists come in. I have nine of them, each populating with 20 songs when I sync. They are:
New Music: Songs that have been added in the past 30 days and have not been played in the past 3 days.
0-9 15 days: Songs that have been played up to nine times, and that have not been played in the past 15 days.
0-9 60 days: Songs that have been played up to nine times, and that have not been played in the past 60 days. This is great for catching those songs that you totally forget about.
The songs with zero to nine plays are somewhere around 55% of the master list as a whole. I was surprised to realize that it was that high.
8-19 15 days: You get the general idea by now.
8-19 60 days
Those are probably the least populated, around 15-20% last time I checked.
19-30 30 days
30+: Songs with more than 30 plays that have not been played for 7 days.
These are the classic gold that you never mind having pop up, so the interval isn't as big.
The final two lists are:
Past Year: Songs that have been added in the past year (I forget the interval here). Helps to make the general tone of the station more current.
Random: Any song from the master list (forget this interval too) that are not on any of the other lists.
So all of those lists are combined under a master list called appropriately enough "Radio Radio". My iPod is checked to have that be the only playlist that syncs (though I do have some particular artists/genres checked in case the mood strikes). Every day after work when I charge the songs that played that day drop off the various lists and are replaced by new entries. When I start listening in the morning I just start up "Radio Radio" on shuffle and boom, a new playlist every day.
Now to be sure there are some iPod quirks that come up. For one thing there definitely seem to be "Artists of the Day" where you'll get five or six songs from the same artist, even weirder it almost seems to progress down the artist list roughly alphabetically, so if one day is heavy on Spoon the next is far more likely to be White Stripes or Wilco rather than say Beck. Also there are still some things that the iPod just seems to love (Southern Rock Opera, I'm looking at you. And even new stuff, after adding the Zappa earlier in the month I've had 6 plays of "Dong Work For Yuda" yet there are songs from 2009 with zero plays. The joys of randomness). But all in all it makes my daily drudgery just a little less so.
But now I've got too many songs getting over 30 plays so am going to have to revise and am wondering if play counts are enough anymore. And that begs the question of you, the blog audience: Suggestions? Ideas? Theories?
You may say "Why, Pat, why must you be so random? Whatever is wrong with listening to entire discs? I don't even know you anymore, man!". Fair. Easy response is that I don't want to have to figure out what to listen to every forty minutes or so. Slightly deeper response is that I love the spontaneity of radio but hate what actually ends up being radio programming. And to get to the core of the matter I have a fascination with the theory of randomness and the ways that it manifests itself, whether through fate, divination or even quantum mechanics; and even more than that the ways that order might be discerned in the midst of randomness. Not having a particular aptitude for mathematics past intermediate algebra and/or Excel formulas I have to rely on more layman and pragmatic ways to indulge this fascination, and putting together the perfect daily random song generation system is about as close as I can regularly get to that.
I do not believe the theories that Apple has any kind of complicated algorithym that determines what comes up when one hits shuffle on their iPod, mainly because I do not see any reason that a company that has the goal of maximizing a profit margin needs to do anything more complicated than assigning each file a number and then generating a random number to play next. That said, boy do the same numbers seem to come up more often than I'd prefer and conversely many numbers I really want to hear come up seldom if ever. Thus, the need to improve on the standard.
First of all I have a master playlist (creatively enough called "A List"). This currently consists of around 6,000 songs (I think there are closer to 10-12K in our entire iTunes library), and is populated in part with: Any new songs over the past few years I've done this, everything by artists I'm still interested in hearing, all music club selections, and generally everything in my library that I don't think will make me groan when it comes on. Mistakes have been made of both inclusion and omission I am sure. That's just too many songs for me to rank in any kind of rating system, so how we choose what gets played out of that list is based on number of plays.
This is where smart playlists come in. I have nine of them, each populating with 20 songs when I sync. They are:
New Music: Songs that have been added in the past 30 days and have not been played in the past 3 days.
0-9 15 days: Songs that have been played up to nine times, and that have not been played in the past 15 days.
0-9 60 days: Songs that have been played up to nine times, and that have not been played in the past 60 days. This is great for catching those songs that you totally forget about.
The songs with zero to nine plays are somewhere around 55% of the master list as a whole. I was surprised to realize that it was that high.
8-19 15 days: You get the general idea by now.
8-19 60 days
Those are probably the least populated, around 15-20% last time I checked.
19-30 30 days
30+: Songs with more than 30 plays that have not been played for 7 days.
These are the classic gold that you never mind having pop up, so the interval isn't as big.
The final two lists are:
Past Year: Songs that have been added in the past year (I forget the interval here). Helps to make the general tone of the station more current.
Random: Any song from the master list (forget this interval too) that are not on any of the other lists.
So all of those lists are combined under a master list called appropriately enough "Radio Radio". My iPod is checked to have that be the only playlist that syncs (though I do have some particular artists/genres checked in case the mood strikes). Every day after work when I charge the songs that played that day drop off the various lists and are replaced by new entries. When I start listening in the morning I just start up "Radio Radio" on shuffle and boom, a new playlist every day.
Now to be sure there are some iPod quirks that come up. For one thing there definitely seem to be "Artists of the Day" where you'll get five or six songs from the same artist, even weirder it almost seems to progress down the artist list roughly alphabetically, so if one day is heavy on Spoon the next is far more likely to be White Stripes or Wilco rather than say Beck. Also there are still some things that the iPod just seems to love (Southern Rock Opera, I'm looking at you. And even new stuff, after adding the Zappa earlier in the month I've had 6 plays of "Dong Work For Yuda" yet there are songs from 2009 with zero plays. The joys of randomness). But all in all it makes my daily drudgery just a little less so.
But now I've got too many songs getting over 30 plays so am going to have to revise and am wondering if play counts are enough anymore. And that begs the question of you, the blog audience: Suggestions? Ideas? Theories?
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Get some sleep and dream of rock and roll
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiEIToOWr64
For consideration
For consideration
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Is that the sun yonder there?
Hang out with lotus people
Down at the beach
Daydreams and brilliant colours
They're in your reach
Down at the beach
Daydreams and brilliant colours
They're in your reach
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
I think I like songs with shouting in them.
It hit me while driving home tonight. Not screaming; shouting. (Although, I don't mind screaming! Sometime I love it!) Cases in point: Cake, Fred Schneider of the B-52s.
Discuss?
Discuss?
Friday, April 1, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)